How to Make Progress in Health Equity

This collection shows what works to advance health equity around the world

Illustration of the Rx symbol with a pill and a hand appearing to hold the pill bottle

Luisa Jung

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article is part of “Innovations In: Solutions for Health Equity,” an editorially independent special report that was produced with financial support from Takeda Pharmaceuticals.

The country someone is born into has a lifelong effect on their health. So does the neighborhood they live in, the color of their skin, their income and their level of social support. It’s unjust. After centuries of persistent health disparities, researchers, advocates, clinicians and public health experts are finding ways to improve health for everyone.

New advances sometimes exaggerate inequities before helping reduce them. But there are reasons for optimism, which journalist Anil Oza shares here. More than almost any other development, vaccines have advanced health equity around the world. They have averted 154 million deaths over the past 50 years, a life saved every 10 seconds, as health writer Tara Haelle explains with graphics. Collaborative campaigns have brought this powerful preventive health care to children in even the most impoverished regions. Writer Carrie Arnold shows how rural areas around the world are benefiting from other inventive and resourceful ways to deliver needed care—from telemedicine to micro clinics to a traveling dialysis bus.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers are working to remove racial bias that has been built into diagnostics, and by doing so they’re changing not just tools and algorithms but lives. As journalist Cassandra Willyard writes, some Black patients once deemed ineligible for new kidneys, despite having the same laboratory results as white patients, are now moving up the wait list for transplant; others with respiratory issues might be able to file for disability after previously being judged unqualified. Epidemiologists and other public health scientists are discovering that prior assumptions about race have lumped together disparate groups with different needs and health risks, particularly within Asian American communities [see graphic here]. Now, by teasing apart the data, they are able to better diagnose, treat and even prevent disease. Health writer Jyoti Madhusoodanan reveals how this data-driven approach is already saving lives.

Certain diseases and conditions have been used to justify discrimination, especially when the disease is more prevalent in a group that’s already marginalized. The people most at risk for mpox, for instance, are men who have sex with men—a community already hit hard by HIV/AIDS. But as global health expert Charles Ebikeme writes, researchers, clinicians and community members have learned from past experiences and are building up existing networks and clinics that cater specifically to this stigmatized population. Even health-care communication is improving, writer Rod McCullom shares, as the movement toward culturally sensitive care helps clinicians better understand and empathize with their patients.

Improving health equity requires rethinking our global health infrastructure, and we are still at the beginning. But each solution adds support and begins to build a path toward justice.

Lauren Gravitz is a science journalist in San Diego, Calif., who has contributed to Nature, NPR, the Washington Post, MIT Technology Review and the Economist, among other publications. She is a 2021–2022 Knight Science Journalism Project Fellow at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

More by Lauren Gravitz
Scientific American Magazine Vol 331 Issue 4This article was originally published with the title “Health Equity Progress” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 331 No. 4 (), p. 78
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican112024-5LsOqfUeIhidVkA6SEhDbC