We Can Live without Fossil Fuels
The fossil-fuel industry argues that we can’t live without its deadly products. It is wrong
Naomi Oreskes is a professor of the history of science at Harvard University. She is author of Why Trust Science? (Princeton University Press, 2019) and co-author of The Big Myth (Bloomsbury, 2023).
We Can Live without Fossil Fuels
The fossil-fuel industry argues that we can’t live without its deadly products. It is wrong
Contrary to Occam’s Razor, the Simplest Explanation Is Often Not the Best One
Occam’s razor holds that the simplest explanation is closest to the truth. But the real world is quite complex
The Arctic Seed Vault Shows the Flawed Logic of Climate Adaptation
The difficulties of the Svalbard seed repository illustrate why we need to prevent climate disaster rather than plan for it
Science Improves When People Realize They Were Wrong
Science means being able to change your mind in light of new evidence
The Gas Industry Is Gaslighting the Public about Climate Change
A fossil-fuel executive blames consumers for the climate crisis
Asbestos Is Finally Banned in the U.S. Here’s Why It Took So Long
The carcinogenic effects of asbestos have been known for decades. We should have banned it long ago
In Matters of Scientific Debate, Follow the Houdini Rule
Scientific expertise is typically limited and specific. When evaluating scientific claims, look to the relevant experts
The Dangers of Fast Science
Scientific research needs to slow down, not speed up, to produce trustworthy results
The False Promise of Carbon Capture as a Climate Solution
Fossil-fuel companies use captured carbon dioxide to extract more fossil fuels, leading to a net increase in atmospheric CO2
Environmental Protection Does Not Kill Jobs
The argument that we have to choose between saving nature and strengthening the economy is a false dichotomy
Calling Our Times the ‘Anthropocene Epoch’ Matters Dearly to You
The name Anthropocene means human activity is profoundly changing our environment, and you’ll have to plan for those changes
The Ivy League Gets Attention, but Public Universities Are Far More Important
Media attention to Ivy League schools distracts from the much more important—and undersupported—public university system
What Went Wrong with a Highly Publicized COVID Mask Analysis?
The Cochrane Library, a trusted source of health information, misled the public by prioritizing rigor over reality
Rosalind Franklin Deserves a Posthumous Nobel Prize for Co-discovering DNA Structure
Awarding Rosalind Franklin a Nobel Prize posthumously for her role in DNA discovery is the honorable—and scientific—thing to do
Hope for Ending Gun Violence Is Not Enough—We Need Fury
Outrage, not hope, will move us to prevent gun violence
Why Nuclear Fusion Won’t Solve the Climate Crisis
Nuclear fusion will scale up too late to avoid climatic catastrophe
Attacks on Child Labor Laws Are a Dangerous Throwback to Social Darwinism
Recent efforts to weaken labor protections for minors are linked to the social Darwinist notion that people are inherently unequal
False ‘Facts’ about Science and Social Security Share Origins
Fake claims that Social Security is broken and that climate action isn’t urgent all come from flawed free-market ideology
Landslides Kill and Hurt Thousands, but Science Largely Ignores These Disasters
Compared with landslides, volcanoes and hurricanes get a lot more attention, as well as research funding
Eight Billion People in the World Is a Crisis, Not an Achievement
More people will not solve the problem of too many people
We Can’t Solve Our Climate Problems without Removing Their Main Cause: Fossil-Fuel Emissions
“Realists” argue that climate plans need to accommodate oil and gas, but that only perpetuates the climate crisis
Hilaree Nelson Was One of the Greatest Adventurers Ever
The mountaineer Hilaree Nelson inspired people to care about the climate crisis
Arctic Lakes Are Disappearing Fast, and Scientists Are Just Figuring Out Why
In an ominous sign of global warming, melting permafrost underneath Arctic lakes lets them drain into the ground
Why Scientists Got the Fast Pace of Arctic Warming Wrong
Concerns about accusations of hype may have biased them toward conservative underestimates